
Special Report: Introducing young
minds to ubiquity of engineering

Most
humanities majors probably assume that if one didn't take
physics, auto shop, and AP calculus in high school, that
taking a college engineering course would be pure folly,
like diving into shark-infested waters during a feeding
frenzy.
But at the School of Engineering and Applied
Science (SEAS) faculty are working to prove that their
areas of expertise don't have to be so scary. In fact,
to convince A.B. students that the water is safe, SEAS
professors regularly create new courses that serve as engineering
wading pools.
They teach some engineering basics, often
combining engineering with other fields. These courses
can teach students a great deal, without being as daunting
as the deep, murky waters of Nonlinear System Theory or
the Energetics of Biological Macromolecules.
Of course these courses aren't just for A.B.
students. For engineering majors, these courses provide
opportunities to think about the social implications of
engineers' work. They provide chances for SEAS majors to
exercise their brains in other ways, by combining engineering
and computer science with art, drama, economics, and sociology.
And, perhaps most importantly, these courses can be a lot
of fun.
Four of these courses are featured on the
following seven pages.
In ELE 222: Earth, Wind, and Fire, electrical
engineering professors Sharad Malik, James Sturm '79, and
Sanjeev Kulkarni let students in on a few fundamental secrets
that prove that the land of technology isn't really a mysterious
Shangri-la reserved for geniuses.
Computer Science Professor David Dobkin and
Economics Professor Paul DiMaggio team up in FRS 129: Sex,
Money, and Rock and Roll, to piece together a picture of
the science and culture of information technologies.
In FRS 107: Computer Animation, Computer Science
Assistant Professor Adam Finkelstein and Princeton University
Press designer Grady Klein turn students into filmmakers
as they train them in the art and science of computer animation.
Finally, Christopher Rogers, visiting professor
in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
lets his students feel a little like Dale Earnhardt, and
a little like Dr. Frankenstein, in FRS 137: Robots.
These four courses will help A.B. students
and engineering underclassmen develop their SEAS legs.
Studying the elements: Earth, wind, and fire
This course looks at silicon, wireless, and
fiber optics
by Sara Peters
|
"My favorite part of teaching this class
has been the intellectual challenge of distilling
the absolutely essential elements to transmit to
students. Some may be interested, now, to dig deeper."
-- Professor James Sturm
'79

Photo by Frank Wojciechowski
"We have a group of students who are
very bright and actively engaged in the learning
process. That is the best reward you can get when
you teach."
-- Professor Sharad Malik |
Professor
Sharad Malik does not go easy on you. His questions are
not rhetorical. He patiently awaits responses from his
students, perhaps giving a subtle hint, watching them connect
the mental dots, slowly drawing the answers out of their
minds.
By the end of class, though, Professor Malik
has clearly done his job. Hands go up, eyes reflect the
first light of comprehension, and answers come without
coaxing. It's a fascinating process, watching students
learn.
The course in which this impressive transformation
is taking place is ELE 222: Earth, Wind, and Fire. Professor
Malik teaches the course with Electrical Engineering Professors
James Sturm '79 and Sanjeev Kulkarni.
In case you are wondering, ELE 222 is not
a music class studying the popular '70s disco-funk group,
Earth, Wind, and Fire. On the contrary, it is a study of
the engineering of computing and communication technologies.
The elemental references represent the materials used to
create computing and communication infrastructure: silicon,
wireless, and fiber optics, respectively.
The class examines the differences between
various computing and communication technologies, and the
materials, tools, and know-how used to develop new technology.
The course identifies and defines terms that
are often cavalierly tossed around as part of the techno-geek
jargon. And it addresses some of the political, economic,
and social constructs that motivate and shape modern computing
and communication technologies.
The professors designed the course hoping
to appeal to A.B. and B.S.E. students. The professors said
that even the most advanced computing and communication
technologies are not nearly as cryptic as they're made
out to be.
"Things like PDAs and wireless Web browsers
all seem like magic," Professor Sturm said. "Just how do
they really work? Can you understand the basics without
five years of school?"
The wide range of technologies is all based
upon just a few main concepts. The professors clearly outline
these few concepts in class so that humanities students
do not feel overwhelmed or out of their element.
Yet, Professor Malik said that ELE 222 might
also serve as an introductory electrical engineering course,
since the department offers no such intro class yet. Students
say that the course is a good introduction to engineering
because it shows how engineers deeply impact every aspect
of our lives.
"I'm B.S.E. but I don't know which field I
want to concentrate in, which is why I'm taking this course," Bernard
Rocca '06 said. "The best part about ELE 222 is that it
teaches us about how some of the most important devices
and machines of today work. These things are often taken
for granted. To know how and why they work on a very deep
level is very gratifying."
ELE 222 also provides a valuable service to
students who don't intend to become engineers but wish
to understand more about the Internet or cellular phones.
Better understanding of the engineering behind such things
will undoubtedly be important to students interested in
finance, business, public policy, or social science.
"For the A.B. students, I hope the course
demystifies technology," Professor Malik said. "This should
enable them to be unintimidated by technological advances
and provide them with the intellectual prowess to comprehend
and analyze technological innovations in a policy or business
setting."
In fact making the connection with the nonengineering
students has been Professor Malik's favorite part of class.
"From class participation, it looks like we
have been successful in our main objectives with the nonengineers," Professor
Malik said. "Not only do we get back enthusiastic responses
on factual issues, but also on the rationale behind various
things."
By all accounts the class has been enjoyable
for students and professors alike.
"Classroom feedback has been very positive," Professor
Malik said. "We have a group of students who are very bright
and actively engaged in the learning process. That is the
best reward you can get when you teach."
Animation class helps students give life to
abstract imaginings
by Sara Peters
Motion studies by Heather Larkin '06
for FRS 107: Computer Animation.
Above: hand-drawn running deer. Below:
Similar motion for rough computer model.
Photo by Frank Wojciechowski
Adam Finkelstein,
assistant professor of computer science, teaches
FRS 107: Computer Animation. |
Some of
us know Gollum and Dobby the House Elf from books. Jar
Jar Binks, Buzz Light Year, Scrat, and Aki Ross on the
other hand, won't be met on a black and white page.
There are many names we might not recognize,
characters we might not have met, if not for the advent
of sophisticated computer animation.
Animation has come
a long way since Mickey Mouse's "Steamboat Willy" in 1928. Entire movies such as "Ice
Age" and "Toy Story," and new video games such as "Grand
Theft Auto" and "The Legend of Zelda" are 100 percent computer
animated. These features create new worlds believable enough
for audiences and players to imagine their way into with
ease.
Computer-generated
characters are also playing opposite human actors in
movies such as "The Lord of the
Rings," "Harry Potter," and "Star Wars," and must maintain
the realism presented
by their human costars. Computer animation is an exhilarating
and challenging field for computer experts and artists
alike, a fact that is evident in a new freshman seminar,
FRS 107: Computer Animation.
The class is taught by the dynamic, yet laid-back
duo of Adam Finkelstein, assistant professor of computer
science, and Grady Klein, a designer at the Princeton University
Press.
The two teachers discovered their mutual interest
in computer animation while enjoying another mutual hobby:
ultimate frisbee.
They played frisbee games for months, before
joining forces to teach COS 598: Animation, a graduate-level
course. They decided the class would translate well to
a freshman seminar, and began FRS 107 this fall.
Although they share an interest in the subject
and a zest for teaching, they differ in expertise, which
gives their students' a fuller experience.
"The benefit of working together is that we
have complementary backgrounds, and therefore offer the
students a broader range of experience," Professor Finkelstein
said. "Grady is an artist and has a strong interest in
both storytelling and the aesthetic qualities of the animation.
I'm a technology person, and bring to the seminar insight
into how the tools of computer graphics work, and how to
use them effectively."
They allow their students to call them by
their first names. They maintain an informal atmosphere
to encourage class participation, discussion, and creativity.
And sure, they may
occasionally watch clips of movies in class (like Yoda's
big light sabre battle
from "Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones"). Do
not, however, for a moment mistake this informality as
an indicator of an easy A.
In "The Fellowship of the Ring," when
Gollum's eyes scan across the screen, glowing, flickering
with pain
and envy, a viewer shivers like they're seeing a creature
of flesh and cold blood, not a collection of computer bytes.
To learn how to create such a powerful effect,
students must exercise both their right and left brains
equally. The course work delves into computer science,
drama, art, and more.
Topics such as plot flow, character development,
character expression, movement, and realism are considered
when creating a storyboard. Style, color, light, and shadow
are all considered when creating the illustrations. The
science behind light and motion are addressed.
Finally, when all of these elements are mixed
together, the combination must be transmitted to the computer,
so a proficiency in certain computer programs becomes necessary.
To cover all of these topics, the class met
twice a week: once in a classroom like a seminar and once
in the computer lab, which is more like a workshop. During
labs students were trained in the use of appropriate software,
such as Lightwave, a commercial computer animation system
that creates astoundingly realistic light and shadow effects.
But the fun didn't stop there.
"Since this is my area of research, we can
offer the students some access to tools we are developing
here at Princeton that are not yet generally available
in the animation community," Professor Finkelstein said. "This
allows the students to do something really unique and pushes
us to make our tools more accessible to nontechnical users."
Many students said that learning to use Lightwave
was the favorite thing covered in class. Some expressed
that learning to use this animation and illustration software
makes it possible to take the more abstract imaginings
of their minds and bring them to life.
"I have really enjoyed learning how to use
the program Lightwave," said Eric Knauft '06, who plans
to major in physics. "I am a very spacial thinker, and
the notion of creating mathematical surfaces that approximate
real objects satisfies both my desires for order and aesthetic
grace. I think this class has allowed me to further explore
combining order and beauty."
The students exercised tremendous skills of
observation and put together many pieces that did not always
look as though they were part of the same puzzle.
The interdisciplinary nature of the course
is what made it so challenging, but also fun and attractive
to a variety of students. The students enjoyed learning
from each other as well as their professors.
"The focus on group work has forced me to
see things from the position of my teammates," said Dan
Recht '06, another potential physics major. "This has,
on several occasions, been quite enlightening. I cannot
draw, and (my groupmate) John Doherty '06 is a phenomenal
artist. It was very interesting working with him to create
an animated story reel composed of his drawings."
Group work is of paramount importance to the
students, so they can learn from the differing perspectives
of their classmates.
The ultimate assignment for the course was
a group project to create a 30-second, three-dimensional,
animated clip.
During the seminar, the professors and students
critiqued the progress of the group work, discussed the
challenges and benefits of giving an animal anthropomorphic
characteristics, and added extra frames to express an idea
more clearly.
Students varied in opinion on the question
of whether the course would appeal more to A.B. students
or computer science and engineering students. However,
they all agreed that they had fun in the course; a sentiment
shared by their teachers.
"I generally like teaching, but this is the
most fun I've ever had in a course," Professor Finkelstein
said. "It's really a terrific group of students -- all
good spirits. They have a pretty broad range of perspectives
but are doing a great job of teaching each other and collaborating
on their projects. And how could anyone not have fun in
a course about animation?"
nimation.
For a peek at some of the projects and programs
from FRS 107: Computer Animation, see www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall02/frs107.
Sex, Money, Rock and Roll
Class studies economy, policy, sociology of
Internet republic
by Sara Peters
Photo
by Frank Wojciechowski
"FRS 129 has been a delight to teach.
The freshmen are energetic and enthusiastic, so
they are fun to teach."
-- Professor David Dobkin
|
If one were
looking for a class in which one could discuss communism,
spud gun technology, and the benefits of a diet consisting
solely of fruit, one would probably assume that such a
course could not be found on the Princeton campus.
After all, what would communists, spud gun
enthusiasts, and fruitarians possibly have in common? Yet,
there is one trait they share with a thousand other groups...they
all exist on the Internet.
In a small seminar room with a lovely view
at the top of Blair Hall, a group of freshmen tour several
virtual communities (including the aforementioned trio).
They discuss the various ways in which the
Internet is used by these different communities--how their
usage fits their personality, how the usage suits their
purpose, how legislation has impacted information technology,
how information technology affects society, and a stack
of other questions.
It is a meeting of FRS 129: Sex, Money, and
Rock and Roll: Information Technology and Society, a course
as intellectually stimulating as the title would hint.
The FRS 129 seminar examines the social issues
associated with new information technology, focusing on
policy. The course description states that topic matter
will span the fields of computer science, economics, engineering,
information science, law, philosophy, political science,
and sociology.
The professors believe that to have a truly
comprehensive study of technology in a social context,
the technological science and the social science must be
closely examined.
The course is taught by Computer Science Department
Chair David Dobkin and Sociology Professor Paul DiMaggio--a
scholastic combination that is an asset to students and
professors alike.
"Paul brings a very different expertise from
mine, so I learn along with the students when he teaches," Professor
Dobkin said.
Sex, Money, and Rock and Roll may not sound
at first like an apropos name for a class about computers,
but at second glance it's clear that these words resound
loudly in Internet discussion, just like they would in
discussions about television or other communication methods.
There are many issues regarding sex on the
Internet. Pornography sites are commonly the first to have
the most sophisticated technology. How accessible is pornography
for minors? Should one's privacy be maintained when one
is viewing a sexually perverse Web site? Should such sites
even exist?
Every time one makes a purchase from Amazon.com,
banks online, or reads a pop-up advertisement, money becomes
an issue.
Rock and roll has been a major presence on
the World Wide Web since Napster first made headlines inspiring
celebrity-studded debates about copyright laws.
This just scratches the surface of social
issues that arise around the Internet. These professors
have a lot to cover.
"I think this is a very important class because
the Internet will be important throughout the lives of
our students," Professor Dobkin said. "So the course content
is relevant to things they'll be reading in the newspaper
for the rest of their lives. For many of the students,
their focus at Princeton will either be policy or technology.
Without courses like this, it is difficult for students
to be educated in both, and as a result, they are either
technology people who come to policy late in life or vice
versa. Letting people grow up in both worlds is important."
Students in the course said that it made their
entry into their college career very exciting by challenging
and stimulating their intellect, as well as causing them
to examine their belief systems.
"Since this class deals with some controversial
questions," Vidal Sadaka '06 said, "it taught me that many
contemporary issues surrounding information technology
are rooted in ideological differences."
Vidal explained that many of the topics discussed
in class force students to examine their place on the plane
between free speech and accountability.
Web sites that are
sexually explicit, politically incendiary, or dangerously
inaccurate may inspire disgust,
rage, or worry. The students often have to ask themselves "how
free do I really want my free speech to be?"
When online shopping, banking, and communication
makes life easier, it does so at what expense to an individual's
privacy?
The students all agree that their participation
in the course has expanded their perspectives on technology
in their world.
"There's something refreshingly genuine about
the way our class approaches each week's material," Robert
J. Moore '06 said. "It's as though everyone knows a lot
about something and a little about everything, but no one,
not even our professors, leaves without having learned
something."
Students also appreciate the fact that the
seminar gives them a chance to expand their minds, while
giving them a break from the endless tedium of textbooks.
"As a student currently on the rigorous and
fairly structured engineering track," said James Schrader
'06, who's considering majoring in civil and environmental
engineering, "this freshman seminar gives me the opportunity
to do more than simply learn scientific concepts and do
problems.
"It allows me to critically
consider important current events and current policy
issues that begin within
the realm of science but whose implications extend very
far into the realm of everyday life."
"This class is so important because it deals
with the issues in technical terms, but it also focuses
on the impact that innovations have on society," Vidal
said. "I believe this dual perspective is necessary in
all fields, but especially in information technology because
it has such a large place in people's lives and society's
development."
The students said FRS129 appeals to A.B. students
as well as those studying computer science and engineering,
but the course material is easier to digest for those who
already have some understanding of the technology.
"The class certainly doesn't have any natural
inclination toward B.S.E. or A.B. students," Robert said. "In
fact, its appeal lies in the interdisciplinary nature of
its content."
The students and professors express an overall
sense of joy and satisfaction when they discuss this class,
describing it like a breath of fresh air for the mind.
"FRS 129 has been a delight to teach," Professor
Dobkin said. "The freshmen are energetic and enthusiastic,
so they are fun to teach."
"Every week is like a fresh taste of the real
world," Robert Moore said, "where progress is made not
by the application of some specific discipline, but by
the combination of several, and the innovation and creativity
of intelligent people."
Students learn lessons from Legos®
Nothing robotic about response to this seminar
by Steven Schultz
Photo by Denise Applewhite
Christopher Rogers, standing, uses
technology -- in the form of robots made from Legos® --
to engage students in his freshman seminar. The
reaction has been enthusiastic among humanities,
science, and engineering students alike.

Photo by Denise Applewhite
The team of John-Paul Mitchell, Olachi
Opara, Chris Rogan, and Lusann Yang placed first
in team competition in FRS 137: Robots, for a programmable
odometer that feeds the robot information about
how far it has traveled.
"It's a dream.
This is one of the best classes that could ever
happen. You work, but it's
fun. It has everything." |
Mr. T was
going in for the kill. The squat, four-wheeled robot made
of Legos® motored across the floor, dragging
a blue microphone cable behind it.
As the freshmen who created it looked on,
Mr. T made a series of left turns until the cord lassoed
a smaller robot that limped aimlessly across the floor.
The loop tightened; the hapless robot was caught.
It was the start of a session of FRS 137:
Robots, a freshman seminar created by visiting professor
Christopher Rogers to introduce students to concepts of
engineering and physics.
The class revolved around competitions between
robots that students constructed from advanced Lego® kits
that include a small computer, motors, gears, light and
touch sensors, and other gadgetry.
Professor Rogers introduced students to subjects
such as mechanics and circuit design and laid out the ground
rules for the competition.
"For the liberal arts majors, they see that
the engineering stuff is not that scary," said Professor
Rogers, the Kenan Trust Visiting Professor for Distinguished
Teaching in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE). "For
the engineers, they see why they want to take the next
two years of math and physics so they can actually do the
engineering."
Among the students in the class--13 of whom
were planning to major in engineering or science and four
who were to considering major in the humanities--the reaction
was enthusiastic.
"It's a dream," said John-Paul Mitchell. "This
is one of the best classes that could ever happen. You
work, but it's fun. It has everything."
"I really like that it's so different from
anything else I am taking," said Morgan Galland, who is
leaning toward a major in the humanities. "I had never
taken physics before. Now I am learning some physics in
a class that's really interesting, and I'm having a lot
of fun doing it."
Applying principles
The assignment for
week four was to create a "bug" and a "bug catcher." The
only requirement for the bug was that it move, if only
very slowly.
Solutions for the catchers ranged from the
spartan Mr. T, which had no way of detecting the bug but
drove in big loops that were likely to circle it, to a
complex robot that used light and touch sensors to track
its bug and snare it with crab-like pincers.
As the students filtered into the Friend Center
classroom, they began making last-minute adjustments, but
they were also looking with open admiration at the creations
of their competitors.
"Some of them are so elaborate I almost feel
guilty ... but not quite," said Ethan Clarke, as he looked
over the entrants. Ethan helped create Mr. T and its victim
bug along with classmates Nate Domingue, Sameer Sharif,
and Mark Spano.
"We are really good at finding the simplest
solution," Nate said.
"You mean you're really good at defeating
the purpose of the assignment!" another student interjected.
"No, we finished it," Nate insisted. "Isn't
the goal of engineering to do the job as efficiently as
possible with as little material as possible?"
Seeing others apply
the principles from the lectures often brings home the
point best, said Lusann
Yang. "We'll walk into class on Tuesday and say, 'Wow,
I didn't even think of that. That's just plain cool. Now
how do I fix my robot in the space of this one hour so
it can be cooler than that one?'"
The competitive spirit also carries students
through the lecture sessions.
"I learned about torque and gearing in physics
class, but it wasn't fun because I didn't apply it," Yang
said. "But here we want to learn everything, because if
we learn it well, it will help us beat everyone else in
the next competition."
The power to motivate makes robots a great
teaching tool from kindergarten to college, said Professor
Rogers, who, as a faculty member at Tufts University, worked
with Lego® to develop robot kits, which
the company now markets. The project is part of Professor
Rogers' broader effort to combat what he sees as a lack
of attention to math, science, and engineering in primary
schools.
"Kids, from day one, love to build stuff," said
Professor Rogers, whose main research is in fluid dynamics. "If
we can use that love for building to teach them math, science,
engineering, and even reading and writing, it could be
a lot more powerful than just teaching reading," he said.
Engaging students with technology remains
important in college, he said.
"The average graduate from high school these
days has woefully poor self-esteem when it comes to taking
things apart and figuring out how to fix them," he said. "In
this class, they realize they are able to do it, that they
can figure it out, that they take things apart and understand
how they work."
In the bug-catcher challenge, no clear winner
had emerged after several rounds. Professor Rogers ordered
an impromptu winner-takes-all finale, with all the catchers
racing for a single bug. The students stood in a ring,
cheering their creations.
One catcher quickly hit the bug and efficiently
lowered its box-like cage over it.
"That
bug is seriously caught," acknowledged a student whose
catcher was foundering. Meanwhile, Mr. T doggedly circled.
A fresh cheer rose from its partisans as, for a moment,
it looked as though the mic cord would lasso the whole
group. Then Mr. T ran into a wall.
Professor Rogers handed out the victory prize--a
programmable odometer that feeds the robot information
about how far it has traveled--to the team of Yang, Paul,
Allen Hsu, Olachi Opara, and Christopher Rogan.
But class was not quite over. Professor Rogers
grew serious for a last announcement: It had been a poor
showing the previous week at the Frisbee® game
that he instituted after every Tuesday class. A group soon
assembled on the green in front of Fine Hall.
Professor Rogers heartily
urged a visitor into the game. "It's educational," he said, stripping down
to gym shorts and heaving an opening throw to one of his
students. "It's all about fluid dynamics."
[ contents
] [
previous story ] [
next story ]
[ top
of page ]
 |