EQuad News magazine recently spoke with four alumni who are visionaries in the field of health care: Patrick Beattie, Laura Forese, Cato Laurencin and Christopher Loose.
What do you see as the major challenges for global health?
Where are the biggest opportunities for innovation?‚Ä®‚Ä®
Beattie: Few areas in global health are so close to being solved that they wouldn’t benefit from innovation. But health care delivery systems are primed for innovation. As chronic disease becomes a larger burden and the relative importance of broader health care services and monitoring rises, it will quickly become apparent that developed-world delivery models will not work. Creating a system that will work is going to require innovation in delivery methods, available tools (to enable testing and monitoring at lower price-points), and payment methods. The challenges are daunting but the opportunities are exciting.
Laurencin: Our main barrier to innovation is ourselves. We must rededicate ourselves to the education and development of our young people, as we are rapidly falling behind the rest of the world in science engineering and math. “No child left behind” must become, “Every child up front.” We must raise standards, expectations and resources for the development of our young people.
Forese: We need to drive technology to both replace practitioners and to help people monitor their own health. We are never going to have enough doctors and nurses to treat everyone; technology can augment manpower tremendously.
One of the greatest opportunities around health innovation is that we can do so much more in prevention. If you can prevent something, obviously you don’t have to treat it. In the United States that looks very different than it would for developing parts of Africa, where clean water and clean air and improvements like that are most important.
Loose: The most urgently needed innovations are those that can improve patient outcomes while removing costs from the healthcare system.
How will health care in the United States change in the next ten years?
Laurencin: I think President Obama’s healthcare legislation will have a tremendously positive impact on medicine. Quality and safety will become a mainstay of treatment, and organizations and doctors will be held accountable and rewarded for such efforts. We are entering an exciting new era in healthcare.
Loose: The shift from “fee for service” to “pay for performance” will put an increasing focus on approaches and technology that can improve the efficiency with which quality health care is delivered. This change will require improved technology to reduce patient complications, enable more effective home care, and reduce re-admittance. Advances in healthcare information technology have the potential to further improvement safety, health care efficiency, and patient outcomes.
Forese: U.S. health care is going to change significantly. We will see much more emphasis on prevention and wellness. This will stem from people’s awareness about how important prevention is but also will come about because the sheer number of dollars we spend on health care is not sustainable. We have very high demands for our personal health in the United States. We expect that everyone who needs it should be able to get a heart transplant.
A big one that we have to get our arms around – no pun intended – is obesity. Obesity is like smoking was 10 or 20 years ago. We no longer tolerate certain attitudes regarding smoking that used to be commonplace. Similarly our attitudes about junk food and other obesity drivers will change drastically. Obesity is responsible for a significant number of our health care dollars in a way that we cannot sustain in the next 10 years.
Beattie: The health care system in the U.S. has many entrenched interests and is generally very conservative, which means that fundamental shifts are difficult to achieve. However, the current crisis around health care costs coupled with the popularity of cell phones that are in reality computers capable of acting as platforms for innovation will force us to reevaluate our current system, especially the relative merits of centralized versus decentralized systems.